Get an Expert Solution to these questions. Click on the WhatsApp button below.

Scan the code
Open Chat

Strand A. Scientific Investigation Skills and Career Exploration

  1. Demonstrate scientific investigation skills (related to both inquiry and research) in the four areas of skills (initiating and planning, performing and recording, analysing and interpreting, and communicating);
  2. Identify and describe a variety of careers related to the fields of science under study, and identify scientists, including Canadians, who have made contributions to those fields.

Strand B: Biochemistry

  1. analyse technological applications of enzymes in some industrial processes, and evaluate technological advances in the field of cellular biology;
  2. investigate the chemical structures, functions, and chemical properties of biological molecules involved in some common cellular processes and biochemical reactions;
  3. demonstrate an understanding of the structures and functions of biological molecules, and the biochemical reactions required to maintain normal cellular function.

Strand C: Metabolic Processes

  1. analyse the role of metabolic processes in the functioning of biotic and abiotic systems, and evaluate the importance of an understanding of these processes and related technologies to personal choices made in everyday life;
  2.  investigate the products of metabolic processes such as cellular respiration and photosynthesis;
  3. demonstrate an understanding of the chemical changes and energy conversions that occur in metabolic processes.

Stand D: Molecular Genetics

  1.  analyse some of the social, ethical, and legal issues associated with genetic research and biotechnology;
  2.  investigate, through laboratory activities, the structures of cell components and their roles in processes that occur within the cell;
  3. demonstrate an understanding of concepts related to molecular genetics, and how genetic modification is applied in industry and agriculture.

Strand E: Homeostasis

  1. evaluate the impact on the human body of selected chemical substances and of environmental factors related to human activity;
  2. investigate the feedback mechanisms that maintain homeostasis in living organisms;
  3. demonstrate an understanding of the anatomy and physiology of human body systems, and explain the mechanisms that enable the body to maintain homeostasis.

Strand F: Population Dynamics

  1. analyse the relationships between population growth, personal consumption, technological development, and our ecological footprint, and assess the effectiveness of some Canadian initiatives intended to assist expanding populations;
  2.  investigate the characteristics of population growth, and use models to calculate the growth of populations within an ecosystem;
  3. demonstrate an understanding of concepts related to population growth, and explain the factors that affect the growth of various populations of species.

SBI4U Summative: PART B – Current Issues Relating to Biology (20% of Final Grade )

DUE DATE: June 24 , 2020

Introduction:

The strands we visited in our course content consist of the following:

Each one of these strands has an expectation relating to analyzing and evaluating technological, personal, societal, and environmental applications. Our summative will revisit some of the learning done in this context. You will create a portfolio for this summative.

Your task:

You are required to find one current article for EACH of the strands listed above. For each of the article you select, you are to do the following:

Articles:

Summary (Minimum of ½ page double-spaced)

Connections (Minimum of ½ page double-spaced)

Reflection (Minimum of 1 page double-spaced)

Evaluation:

The five expectations you should be thinking about as you find articles and complete this assignment are the first in each strand of the SBI4U curriculum. During the course, your teacher will provide suggested topics to get you started on your article research. If you are not sure if your article is applicable to the strand, ask your teacher for approval!

  1. Analyze technological applications in some industrial processes, and evaluate technological advances in the field of cellular biology.

Where to Start Looking:

Below are some excellent online resources to start finding appropriate AND credible articles for this summative task.

There are also great print resources to access such as reputable newspapers (eg. The Toronto Star, Globe & Mail, The National Post) and scientific magazines (such as the ones listed above) that you can find at your pharmacy or bookstore. However, due to the times, your most likely sources would be online. So, make sure that the sites that you use are credible. 

Marking Rubric

CriteriaR (<49%)Level 1 (50-59%)Level 2 (60-69%)Level 3 (70-79%)Level 4 (80-100%)
Knowledge          ( 20%)    Score  ______________
Research of information and the quality of research in the form of supporting details   (SUMMARY) 20%Inadequate information is included, many errors and/or omissionsLimited information is included, some is confusing, inadequate or unclearSome relevant information is included, some may be minimally presented or unclearMost relevant and recent information is included and clearly documented in projectHigh quality, extensive information (relevant and recent) is included, clearly and thoroughly documented in project  
Mark                /20                 5   6   7   8   910     1112   1314    15          16   17   18   19   20
Thinking ( 30%)  Score ________________
Makes connection between science, technology, society and the environment   (COURSE CONNECTIONS) (30%)Work does not address the curricular strands. Incorrect or no connection to relevant units of study.Work is limited or does not specifically address curricular strands. Limited connection to relevant units of study.Work somewhat addresses curricular strands. Connection to relevant units of study somewhat made.Work addresses the curricular strands. Good connection to relevant units of study.Work addresses the curricular strands in insightful manner. Connection to relevant units of study. Clear and cohesive.
Mark                /20                 5   6   7   8   910     1112   1314    15          16   17   18   19   20
Application (30% Score   ____________
Response to research – demonstration of critical and analytical thinking skills   (REFLECTION)Inadequate, erroneous or no analysis submitted and/or not based on articles and/or no ideas for actionLimited analysis of social, ethical, and scientific implications and/or stated opinions loosely based on articles. Limited ideas for action on issueSome analysis of social, ethical, and scientific implications. Somewhat limited opinions based on articles. Some ideas proposed for action on issueConsiderable analysis of social, ethical, and scientific implications. Well stated opinions based on articles, ideas for practical action on issueThorough, insightful analysis of social, ethical, and scientific implications. Clearly stated opinions based on articles, effective ideas for practical action on issue
Mark                /20                 5   6   7   8   910     1112   1314    15          16   17   18   19   20
Documentation of sourcesNo documentation of sources received. No hard copies of articles.Includes inadequate and/or questionable and/or repetitive sources and/or some errors or omissions documentation. Some hard copies of articles missing.Includes few and/or somewhat questionable and/or somewhat varied sources, a few minor errors or omissions in documentation. 1-2 hard copies of articles missing.Includes suitable, varied sources, all properly referenced as required. All hard copies submitted.Includes numerous, high quality and varied sources, properly referenced as required. All hard copies submitted.
Mark                /10                 2   3   4567         8   9   10
Communication ( 20%)  __________
Overall presentationSloppy, illegible, full of spelling and grammar errors or no report submitted. Audience cannot read this portfolio.Barely meets minimum presentation requirements. Shows little planning, hardly legible, many spelling and grammar errors. Audience may find portfolio difficult to read.Adequate presentation, some evidence of planning, somewhat neat & legible, some spelling and grammar errors. Somewhat appropriate portfolio for audience.Good presentation, neat, planned, and legible, with good spelling and grammar. Appropriate reading for audience.Outstanding presentation, neat, well-designed, with excellent spelling and grammar. Professional portfolio suitable for all audiences.
Mark                /20                 5   6   7   8   910     1112   1314    15          16   17   18   19   20

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *