Get an Expert Solution to these questions. Click on the WhatsApp button below.
Required readings for this unit include the following:
- Topic 4.1: Deviance and Crime
- Textbook: Chapter 7 “Deviance, Crime, and Social Control”
- Health Officers Council of British Columbia Backgrounder “A Public Health Approach to Drug Control in Canada.”
- Topic 4.2: Genders and Sexualities
- Textbook: Chapter 12 “Gender, Sex and Sexuality.”
- Fausto-Sterling, A. (1993, Mar/April). The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female Are Not Enough. The Sciences, 20–24.
- Topic 4.3: The Body—Disabilities, Health, and Medical Sociology
- Textbook: Chapter 19 “The Sociology of the Body: Health and Medicine”
- Hacking, I. (2006, August 16–17). Making Up People. London Review of Books 28, 23–26.
Introduction
In Unit 4, we build on the sociological principles that we have learned so far in Sociology 1111 and apply them to three specific areas of sociological research: the study of crime and deviance; the study of sexuality and gender; and the study of disabilities, health, and the human body.
One of the principal insights of contemporary sociology is that a focus on the social construction of different social experiences and problems leads to alternative ways of understanding and responding to them. With respect to each of the three topic areas of Unit 4, the sociologist often confronts a legacy of entrenched beliefs concerning innate biological disposition or the individual psychopathology of persons considered abnormal: the criminal personality, the sexual or gender “deviant,” the ill or disabled individual. However, as Ian Hacking observes, even when these beliefs about kinds of persons are products of objective scientific classification, the institutional context of science and expert knowledge is not independent of societal norms, beliefs, and practices (see Ian Hacking [2006] “Making Up People,” which is a supplementary reading for Unit 4). The process of classifying kinds of people is a social process that Hacking calls “making up people” (Hacking, 2006, p. 23) and Howard Becker (1963) calls “labeling.”
Part of the problem of “social problems” is that the social process of labeling some kinds of persons or activities as abnormal or deviant limits the type of social responses available. The major issue is not that labels are arbitrary or that it is possible not to use labels at all, but that the choice of label has consequences. Who gets labeled by whom and the way social labels are applied have social repercussions. Therefore, it is necessary to use the sociological imagination to address the consequences of social labelling at both at the individual and social levels.
| Figure 4.1. Commit Sociology T-shirt. Source: Canadian Sociological Association. | Figure 4.2. Commit Sociology T-shirt. Source: Canadian Sociological Association. |
Unit 4 of Sociology 1111 is divided into three topics:
- Topic 4.1: Deviance and Crime
- Topic 4.2: Genders and Sexualities
- Topic 4.3: The Body—Disabilities, Health, and Medical Sociology
Topic 4.1: Deviance and Crime
In topic 4.1, we examine the theme that crime and deviance are social constructs that vary according to the definitions of crime, the forms and effectiveness of policing, the social characteristics of criminals, and the relations of power that structure society. It surveys the different approaches that symbolic interactionism, functionalism, and critical sociology take to explain why crime and deviance occur. It also uses the sociological framework to explore current issues concerning why anxiety about violent crime seems to be increasing at the same time that the violent crime rate has decreased, why aboriginal Canadians are overrepresented in Canadian prisons and police arrest statistics, and why prisons continue to be the dominant means of criminal social control despite their well-documented problems and the existence of alternatives.
Topic 4.2: Genders and Sexualities
In topic 4.2, we focus on the themes of gender and sexuality: their diversity and their intersection with relationships of power and stratification. The topic explores the social dimensions of gender and sexuality through the perspectives of functionalism, symbolic interactionism, and critical sociology. Key to the sociological analysis of gender and sexuality is the disentanglement of their biological components from their social components. Gender and sexual norm-breakers like intersexuals, transsexuals, gays, and lesbians provide an invaluable opportunity to study the heteronormative social processes that create gender and sexual “normals.”
Topic 4.3: The Body—Disabilities, Health, and Medical Sociology
In topic 4.3, we examine the human body from a sociological perspective. What is the relationship between society and the human body? How does this relationship influence how we think about health and what it means to be healthy? The key themes in this topic include the study of social variables of health (social epidemiology), the process of medicalization, and who or what gets to be defined as disabled. Disabilities, illness, and mortality are not simply physiological qualities but depend, in important respects, on the social context and parameters in which they are defined as problems.
Learning Objectives
After you successfully complete Unit 4, you will be able to:
- Define the following key terms: crime, deviance, labelling, social control, normalizing society, masculinity and femininity, sexuality, heteronormativity, sociology of the body, disability, ableism, medicalization, social epidemiology, and biopolitics.
- Explain why deviance, gender, sexuality, health, disability, and the body are not simply the products of innate or biological qualities.
- Explain what is meant by the social construction of crime and deviance and why this concept is key to understanding current issues concerning criminality, crime rates, prisons, and social control strategies.
- Identify the social factors that determine crime rates, the perception of crime, and inequalities in incarceration.
- Analyze the life of the body (gender, sexuality, disability, health) in terms of social processes and structures.
- Describe the formation of gender, sexual, ability, and health identities.
- Analyze the gender, sexual, and ability basis of inequality.
Topic 4.1: Deviance and Crime
The sociological study of crime, deviance, and social control is especially important with respect to public policy debates. The political controversies that surround the question of how best to respond to crime are difficult to resolve at the level of political rhetoric. Often, in the news and public discourse, the issue is framed in moral terms and therefore, for example, the policy alternatives get narrowed to the option of either being “tough” on crime or “soft” on crime. “Tough” and “soft” are moral categories that reflect a moral characterization of the issue. A question framed by these types of moral categories is not falsifiable (recall the discussion of falsifiability in Chapter 2) and cannot be resolved by using evidence-based procedures. Posing the debate in these terms narrows the range of options available and undermines the ability to raise questions about what responses to crime actually work.
Unit 4, Topic 4.1 Activities
For Topic 4.1, work through the following activities; as you work through each focus question, make notes and write your answers:
- Activity 4.1a: Deviance and Crime
- Activity 4.1b: Debating Mandatory Minimum Sentences—The Safe Streets and Communities Act
- Activity 4.1c: Public Health Approaches to Drug Control in Canada
Activity 4.1a: Deviance and Crime
In Introduction to Sociology (2nd Canadian Ed.), read Chapter 7 “Deviance, Crime, and Social Control” and take notes using the following focus questions:
- Why is no act deviant in and of itself? What are the implications of this argument for the sociological study of deviance and crime?
- What is the difference between deviance and crime?
- What are the three types of norm that deviant acts are seen to violate? What are the four levels of seriousness of deviance and crime?
- What is the difference between positive and negative sanctions? Formal and informal sanctions?
- Contrast three modes of social control: penal social control, discipline, and risk management.
- Why are individuals motivated to commit crime or deviance? Contrast the approaches of functionalism, critical sociology, and symbolic interactionism.
- In functionalist approaches to deviance, what is the difference between control theory and strain theory?
- Why does the distinction between street crime and white-collar crime skew our perception of the issue of crime in society?
- How does gender inequality influence the opportunities to commit crime and the definition, detection, and prosecution of crime?
- In symbolic interactionism, what is the difference between differential association theory and labelling theory? In what sense do they both argue that deviance is learned?
- What causes moral panic? What is the effect of moral panic on social control?
- What are two different ways to measure rates of crime? What are the strengths and drawbacks of each of these measures?
- Why have rates of violent crime decreased since 1990?
- What does it mean to say that a category of people is overrepresented in rates of arrest or imprisonment? What are the social characteristics of individuals who are overrepresented in the criminal justice system? What is the explanation for their overrepresentation?
- Why do incarceration and “get tough” policies on crime remain popular with governments and the public despite their problems? What alternatives to incarceration exist? What is the rationale for alternative strategies for the social control of crime? What are their problems?
Define the following terms:
- Sociopathy
- Deviance vs. crime
- Folkways vs. mores
- Moral panic
- Social control
- Informal vs. formal sanctions
- Four styles of social control
- Disciplinary social control
- Normalizing society
- Risk management
- Control theory vs. strain theory
- Crimes of accommodation
- Street crimes, white collar crime, corporate crime
- Twin myths of rape
- Differential association vs. labeling theory
- Chaos news
- Racial profiling
- Recidivism
- Community based sentencing
- Restorative justice conferencing
- Aboriginal sentencing circles
Activity 4.1b: Debating Mandatory Minimum Sentences—The Safe Streets and Communities Act
Listen to the CBC “The Current” podcast Re-Evaluating Mandatory Minimums and take notes using the following focus questions:
- What is mandatory minimum sentencing?
- How has it been applied with respect to drug possession crimes in the United States?
- Eric Sterling was the legal counsel who drafted the United States mandatory minimum sentencing laws for the U.S. House Judiciary Committee in the 1980s. According to Sterling, what were the three problems with mandatory minimum sentencing laws?
- According to Robert Sampson (former Corrections Minister of Ontario), what are the merits of mandatory minimum sentencing?
- According to each interviewee, what are the merits and problems of using prisons to rehabilitate criminal patterns of behaviour?
- What are the merits and problems of removing judges’ discretion in sentencing?
- After reading Chapter 7 “Deviance, Crime, and Social Control,” how do you assess this debate? What further social scientific information would be required to make an evidence-based decision on this policy?
CBC “The Current” with Anna Maria Tremonti. Re-Evaluating Mandatory Minimums.
Source: CBC (2012). http://www.cbc.ca/thecurrent/episode/2012/03/01/re-evaluating-mandatory-minimums. Used with Permission.
Transcript of CBC “The Current”. Re-Evaluating Mandatory Minimums
Activity 4.1c: Public Health Approaches to Drug Control in Canada
In your textbook, read the section on risk management as a mode of social control. Then read the Health Officers Council of British Columbia Backgrounder “A Public Health Approach to Drug Control in Canada.”
Answer the following questions:
- What are “psychoactive drugs”? How does the backgrounder report distinguish between the beneficial and harmful uses of psychoactive drugs?
- What is a public health model of drug control? How does this differ from the criminal-prohibition model?
- How are drug use and drug users characterized in the public health model and the criminal-prohibition model?
- Define harm reduction.
- What are the three types of drug control policy outlined in the backgrounder?
- How do the three types of policy differ in their understanding of the problem of drug use? What are the benefits and drawbacks of each policy?
- Does the public health model of harm reduction offer a reasonable alternative to the criminal-prohibition model as a means of social control? Why or why not?
Topic 4.2: Genders and Sexualities
What does it mean to have a gender? What does it mean to have a sexuality? These are more difficult questions to answer than it might appear at first glance. To “have” a gender or a sexuality seems to be based in biology—either in the genetic codes that initiate the hormonal sequence that results in the anatomical differences between the sexes or in the more obscure biological and evolutionary processes that produce instinctual sexual desire. However, since the 1970s, sociologists have distinguished between sex as a biologically defined quality that is more or less constant through time and across cultures, and gender and sexuality as socially defined qualities (Fausto-Sterling, 2000, p. 3). This distinction is key to being able to examine gender and sexuality as social variables rather than biological variables.
Figure 4.3. The Berdache or two spirit people of North American native traditions were recognized and honoured as a separate category of sexuality and gender, one in which the spirits of both masculine and feminine were seen to cohabit in the body.
Source: Historic photo of a Navajo same sex couple, (1866).
With respect to the biology of gender and sexuality, Anne Fausto-Sterling (2000) argues that a body’s sex is too complex to fit within the obligatory dual sex system, and ultimately, the decision to label someone male or female is a social decision (p. 4). Her analysis is borne out in the supplementary reading for Topic 4.2 (“The Five Sexes”) and in the discussion of the famous John/Joan case (the life of David Reimer) in your textbook Chapter 12 “Gender, Sex and Sexuality.”
Unit 4, Topic 4.2 Activities
For Topic 4.2, work through the following activities; as you work through each focus question, make notes and write your answers:
- Activity 4.2a: Genders and Sexualities
- Activity 4.2b: The Five Sexes
- Activity 4.2c: The Gender Trap
Activity 4.2a: Genders and Sexualities
In Introduction to Sociology (2nd Canadian Ed.), read Chapter 12 “Gender, Sex, and Sexuality” and take notes using the following focus questions:
- What is the difference between sex, gender, and sexual orientation?
- How do legal precedents reinforce the social rather than the biological nature of gender?
- What is the dominant gender schema? How does the “rule breaking” of transgendered, transsexual, and intersexed people challenge this schema?
- In what sense is gender a performance?
- What is an intersexed individual? How does the story of David Reimer complicate the question of what makes us male or female?
- How do people learn conventional gender roles in everyday life?
- Summarize the different characteristics of men’s and women’s work experience. What are the main reasons for the gender disparity in wages? Do you believe that the declines in wage disparity mean that gender inequality is no longer a real issue? Why or why not?
- How does the functionalist perspective understand the different gender roles of men and women as “complementary”? What is the function of these gender roles? From the critical sociology point of view, what is the problem with the functionalist theory of gender roles?
- Why do women experience bifurcated consciousness in modern society?
- Outline the symbolic interactionist approach to gender difference.
- Is Canada more sexually conservative than the United States? How is this measured?
- What is the origin of the concept of homosexuality? Given the history of sexuality since the 19th century, how would you define a homosexual?
- Contrast the functionalist, critical, and symbolic perspectives on sexuality.
- What are stages of “coming out” for homosexuals? Are these the same as for heterosexuals? Why or why not?
- What is queer theory? What is the queer theory perspective on sexuality?
Define the following terms:
- Sex vs. gender
- Sexual orientation
- Berdache / Fa’afafine
- Heteronormativity
- Homophobia
- Gender identity
- Transgendered vs. transsexual
- Dominant gender schema
- Intersex individuals
- Sexism
- Gender discrimination
- Bifurcated consciousness
- Doing gender
- Sexuality
- Queer theory
Activity 4.2b: The Five Sexes
Read Anne Fausto-Sterling’s “The Five Sexes: Why Male and Female Are Not Enough” and take notes on the following focus questions:
- What is the “two party sexual system” to which Fausto-Sterling refers? How does the case of Levi Suydam upset this sexual system?
- What is Fausto-Sterling’s case for a five-sex system rather than a two-sex system? What are the five sexes?
- Who was Hermaphroditus?
- How is the distinction made between true hermaphrodites and pseudo-hermaphrodites?
- What are the biological processes that result in the birth of an intersex baby?
- What are the social processes that are initiated when a baby with ambiguous genitals is born?
- According to Fausto-Sterling, what is the problem with the medical management of intersex individuals? What is her “utopian” alternative?
- How does Fausto-Sterling characterize the relationship between “sex” and “gender”? What components are social and what components are biological? How does her position fit with the argument in your textbook?
Activity 4.2c: The Gender Trap
Listen to the CBC “Ideas” podcast The Gender Trap, Part 1 and take notes on the following focus questions:
- How have beliefs about the biological differences between the sexes supported gender inequality?
- What arguments—based on the biological differences between the sexes—have been used recently to explain the stalled progress towards gender equality? Are there biological limits to equality?
- How different are men and women? In what respects are they different? What evidence has been put forward to describe the difference? List the ways in which male/female differences have been described as biologically “hardwired.”
- What are the problems with the “game changing” studies that purport to demonstrate hard wired differences between the sexes? What elements of the social context of science are at work in confirming the traditional belief in the differences between the sexes?
- How do reports of the natural difference between the sexes become self-fulfilling prophesies? How do the “social cues” provided by parents and educators reinforce sex differences?
- What are the implications for the educational strategies of studies that show learning differences between boys and girls? What are the implications of studies that show that learning differences between boys and girls are not significant?
- What is the key to making existing “innate differences” between the sexes disappear?
- According to The Gender Trap, Part 1, despite the shift to formal gender equality, how is Western society becoming even more “deeply gendered”? Do you agree?
Topic 4.3: The Body—Disabilities, Health, and Medical Sociology
Whereas human bodies have not changed radically since the evolution of Homo sapiens sapiens 200,000 years ago, our relationship to our bodies has changed. Due to the change in the relationship to our bodies over the last 150 years—in the forms of bio-medical knowledge, nutrition, hygiene, and sanitation, etc.—on average we are healthier, taller, and live longer than our ancestors. Biopolitics is the term used to study the modern concern with administering the life of the population, whether this occurs through macro-level regulatory strategies like the institution of national public health insurance systems or micro-level disciplinary relationships like individual therapies proscribed by doctors. The ways in which the life of the population are administered have had direct consequences for the organization of health practices, the formation of identities, and the life chances of different segments of the population. In sociology, the life of the body is analysed not so much in physiological terms but in terms of the social processes and structures that define how we relate to our bodies.
Figure 4.4. Charles Atlas’s body building ads began to appear in magazines and comic books in the 1930s and 1940s. They became an iconic site through which boys and men were enticed to see their identity in relationship to their bodies.
Source: CHARLES ATLAS, http://www.charlesatlas.com. The Insult That Made A Man Out Of “Mac”. Retrieved from: http://www.charlesatlas.com/classicads.html
Unit 4, Topic 4.3 Activities
For Topic 4.3, work through the following activities: as you work through each focus question, make notes and write your answers:
- Activity 4.3a: The Body—Disabilities, Health, and Medical Sociology
- Activity 4.3b: Making Up People
- Activity 4.3c: The Country of the Blind
- Activity 4.3d: Obesity and Social Networks
Activity 4.3a: The Body—Disabilities, Health, and Medical Sociology
In Introduction to Sociology (2nd Canadian Ed.), read Chapter 19 “Health and Medicine” and take notes using the following focus questions:
- In what way are the public disputes, like the debate around vaccination, sociological issues as well as public health issues?
- How has the relationship to our bodies changed in the modern era? How does biopolitics shape the context in which we relate to our bodies? How does the norm operate in relationship to physical health or ability?
- Outline the three aspects of the “social construction of health.”
- How does health vary by race and ethnicity in Canada? How does it vary by socioeconomic status and gender?
- What is medicalization? Why are women’s bodies more likely to be medicalized than men’s?
- How are mental health disorders like mood disorders, anxiety disorders, and personality disorders affected by sociological variables?
- In what way is disability notbased on self-evident biological realities?
- How did approaches to disability change in the 19th century? What were the two approaches that emerged during that time? In what ways are current approaches to the disabled different?
- Outline the perspectives of functionalism, critical sociology, and symbolic interactionism on health, illness, and medicine.
Define the following terms:
- Biopolitics
- Norm
- Health
- Medical sociology
- Social construction of health
- Stigma / Stigmatization of illness
- Social epidemiology
- Impaired
- Disabled
- Rehabilitation of disabilities
- Ableism
- Sick role
- Care of the self
- Demedicalization
Activity 4.3b: Making Up People
Read Ian Hacking’s “Making Up People” and take notes on the following focus questions:
- What does Ian Hacking mean by “making up people”? With regard to the diagnosis of multiple personality disorder (or dissociative identity disorder), note the distinction that Hacking makes between two ways of describing “making up people.” Why does he think both are true with respect to multiple personalities, but not with respect to high functioning autism?
- What does Hacking mean by the “looping effect”? How do “names interact with the named”?
- What is the advantage of turning the adjectives medical, biological, and genetic into verbs: medicalise, biologise, geneticise?
- Define the five components of the framework Hacking uses to describe making up people: classification, people, institutions, knowledge, and experts.
- How is autism defined? What is the “looping effect” of defining autism this way?
- What are the 10 “engines of discovery” described by Hacking? Why are these engines more than simply procedures for finding the facts about disorders or disabilities? What are some of their side effects?
- In what way is Hacking’s approach to obesity, multiple personalities, and autism a social constructivist approach?
Activity 4.3c: The Country of the Blind
View the video clip disCover: The Meaning of Disability with Rod Michalko.
In his book The Mystery of the Eye and the Shadow of Blindness, Michalko (1998) begins his chapter “What is Blindness?” by recounting the H. G. Wells story “The Country of the Blind.” In this story, Wells imagines a sighted person who through misfortune arrives in a society of blind people in a remote corner of the Andes who have been cut off from the outside world for generations. The memory of sightedness has become a myth that no one believes in anymore. This society is organized on the basis of blindness, and the sighted man soon finds that his ability to see is an impairment that proves a major impediment to his ability to survive and fit in.
The story illustrates how blindness typically is defined as a problem in the context of the meeting of blindness and sightedness. Since blindness usually is perceived from the point of view of the sighted world in which the loss of vision would be a tragedy, it is characterized as a trouble, problem, or adversity that needs to be fixed or coped with. This is the basis of a kind of discrimination called ableism. According to Michalko (1998), “The expression ‘sighted world’ reminds blind persons that they are living in the country of the sighted and that they must learn its language, customs, and folkways. There is no ‘multiculturalism’ in this country when it comes to blindness” (p. 27). The sighted and the blind do not coexist on equal footing.
However, in the video clip disCover: The Meaning of Disability with Rod Michalko, he also describes this problematization of disability as an occasion for the “normals” to look at themselves.
Take notes on the following focus questions:
- In what way is disability a term that carries both “a meaning” and “a feeling”? What is the consequence of thinking about disability this way?
- What does Michalko mean when he says, “When we move through the world we never move alone”?
- On the theme of the “coolness of blindness,” what do you think Michalko means when he says blind people have a “much cooler and clearer understanding of sight than do sighted people”?
- When sighted people look at those with disabilities, in what way do they look more at themselves than at the disabled?
- Why is disability an occasion to think through what it means to be human and what it means for humans to live with one another?
- Michalko describes his approach as interpretivist. From this perspective, his primary research question is to ask: “How is it possible for us to say and do what we say and do about disability”? Why is this an interpretivist approach? In the video interview, how do you think he answers this question about how it is possible?
- What do Michalko’s reflections say about the social construction of sightedness as normal? What are the consequences of his perspective?
Critical Disability Services (2011). Rod Michalko: The Meaning of Disability. CDSMMU.
Source: https://cdsmmu.wordpress.com/media/. Retrieved from: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nvPsShRIcS8.
Transcript of Rod Michalko: The Meaning of Disability
Activity 4.3d: Obesity and Social Networks
In your textbook, review the section on “Social Networks” in Chapter 6 “Groups and Organizations” and then the section “Obesity: The Last Acceptable Prejudice” in Chapter 19. Recall also the Christakis and Fowler reading, “In the Thick of It” in Activity 3.2b: Network Analysis in Unit 3.
View the video clip The Spread of Obesity in Social Networks and then view the video clip Obesity and Social Networks. Take notes on the following focus questions:
- What is the problem with obesity?
- What argument do Christakis and Fowler make in their research on the relationship between social networks and obesity?
- How is it possible that the weight of friends and family, or even the friends of friends and their family, can affect your weight?
- What does this study suggest about the relationship between the body and social relationships?
The Spread of Obesity in Social Networks.
Source: Christakis, N. (2010). Used with permission. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJfq-o5nZQ4.
To view a version with transcript, please see the original source.
References
Becker, Howard. 1963. Outsiders: Studies in the Sociology of Deviance. New York: Free Press. Michalko, Rod. 1988. The Mystery of the Eye and the Shadow of Blindness. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Assignment 4 (Weight 15%) – Instructions and Submission
Assignment 4 covers material presented in Unit 4 of the course and is worth 15% of your total course mark. In Part A, you must write two short paragraph answers of 150–250 words each and, in Part B, you must write one short essay of 400–600 words. In Part C, you will participate in two Discussion forums. You can contribute at any time throughout the course, but please complete the discussion posts for Part C before submitting Assignment 4 to your Open Learning Faculty Member. Each discussion has two activities. To be eligible for marks, you must complete both the activities in each discussion forum. Refer to the “Getting Started in Moodle” link at the top of the Course Guide tab if you are unsure of how to use Moodle’s discussion forum tool.
Part A contributes 20% of your mark for Assignment 4 (2 x 10%); Part B contributes 40%; and Part C contributes 40% (4 x 10%).
Before you begin, under the Assignments Overview tab, review the Assessment Criteria and Submission Instructions for Parts A & B.
Part A: Short Answer Questions
Answer two of the following questions in short paragraph answers of 150–250 words each. (10 marks each)
- Contrast three modes of social control: penal social control, discipline, and risk management. Which of these modes applies to the Health Officers Council of British Columbia Backgrounder “A Public Health Approach to Drug Control in Canada”? (Note: See Activity 4.1c “Public Health Approaches to Drug Control in Canada” in Unit 4.)
- Why are aboriginal Canadians overrepresented in Canadian prisons and police arrest statistics? (Hint: In your answer, define overrepresentation and cite the statistics that show the degree of aboriginal overrepresentation.)
- What is the difference between sex and gender? Explain the importance of this distinction for understanding the dominant gender schema as an ideology.
- What are the main characteristics and causes of gender inequality in wage earnings in Canada?
- What is medicalization? Why is it an issue? Provide an example to illustrate your answer.
- To what degree is obesity a social rather than a physiological phenomenon? (Note: See “Making Connections–Obesity: The Last Acceptable Prejudice” in your textbook and Activity 4.3d: “Obesity and Social Networks” in Unit 4.)
- What are the basic distinctions between the functionalist, critical sociology, and symbolic interactionist approaches to health, illness, and medicine? Provide an example of each to illustrate.
Part B: Short Essay
Answer one of the following questions in an essay of about 400–600 words. (40 marks)
- At a time when the rate of violent crime has decreased, why has the anxiety about violent crime increased? What are the repercussions of this anxiety for contemporary debates about being “tough on crime”? In your answer, please explain the reasons why violent crime has decreased in Canada. (Note: In addition to the information in your textbook, see the debate about mandatory minimum sentences in Activity 4.1b “Debating Mandatory Minimum Sentences—The Safe Streets and Communities Act” in Unit 4.)
- What do sex and gender nonconformists like transsexuals and intersexed people reveal about the relationship between sex and gender? (Note: On intersexed people and the “five sexes,” see Fausto-Sterling’s article in Activity 4.2b “The Five Sexes” in Unit 4. In your essay, make sure to clearly define sex and gender.)
- Are there biological limits to equality between the genders? (Note: In addition to the information in your textbook, see the discussion of the research on the biology of gender differences in Activity 4.2c “The Gender Trap” in Unit 4).
- Why are autism, blindness, and health more than just biological phenomena? (Note: On autism and blindness—in addition to the information in your textbook—see Activities 4.3b “Making Up People” and 4.3c “The Country of the Blind” in Unit 4.)